California has one of the nation’s most comprehensive consumer data privacy laws. But it’s not always easy for people to exercise those privacy rights. That’s why we supported Assemblymember Josh Lowenthal’s A.B. 566 throughout the legislative session and are now asking California Governor Gavin Newsom to sign it into law. 

The easier it is to exercise your rights, the more power you have.  

A.B. 566 does a very simple thing. It directs browsers—such as Google’s Chrome, Apple’s Safari, Microsoft’s Edge or Mozilla’s Firefox—to give all their users the option to tell companies they don't want companies to  to sell or share personal information  that’s collected about them on the internet. In other words: it makes it easy for Californians to tell companies what they want to happen with their own information.

By making it easy to use tools that allow you to send these sorts of signals to companies’ websites, A.B. 566 makes the California Consumer Privacy Act more user-friendly. And the easier it is to exercise your rights, the more power you have.  

This is a necessary step, because even though the CCPA gives all people in California the right to tell companies not to sell or share their personal information, companies have not made it easy to exercise this right. Right now, someone who wants to make these requests has to go through the processes set up by each company that may collect their information individually. Companies have also often made it pretty hard to make, or even find out how to make, these requests. Giving people the option for an easier way to communicate how they want companies to treat their personal information helps rebalance the often-lopsided relationship between the two.

Industry groups who want to keep the scales tipped firmly in the favor of corporations have lobbied heavily against A.B. 566. But we urge Gov. Newsom not to listen to those who want to it to remain difficult for people to exercise their CCPA rights. EFF’s technologists, lawyers, and advocates think A.B. 566 empowers consumers without imposing regulations that would limit innovation. We think Californians should have easy tools to tell companies how to deal with their information, and urge Gov. Newsom to sign this bill. 

This is Part I of a two-part series on EFF’s comments to the International Criminal Court Office of the Prosecutor (OTP) about its draft policy on cyber-enabled crimes.

As human rights atrocities around the world unfold in the digital age, genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity are as heinous and wrongful as they were before the advent of AI and social media.

But criminal methods and evidence increasingly involve technology. Think mass digital surveillance of an ethnic or religious community used to persecute them as part of a widespread or systematic attack against civilians, or cyberattacks that disable hospitals or other essential services, causing injury or death.

The International Criminal Court (ICC) Office of the Prosecutor (OTP) intends to use its mandate and powers to investigate and prosecute cyber-enabled crimes within the court's jurisdiction—those covered under the 1989 Rome Statute treaty. The office released for public comment in March 2025 a draft of its proposed policy for how it plans to go about it.

We welcome the OTP draft and urge the OTP to ensure its approach is consistent with internationally recognized human rights, including the rights to free expression, to privacy (with encryption as a vital safeguard), and to fair trial and due process.

We believe those who use digital tools to commit genocide, crimes against humanity, or war crimes should face justice. At the same time, EFF, along with our partner Derechos Digitales, emphasized in comments submitted to the OTP that safeguarding human rights must be integral to its investigations of cyber-enabled crimes.

That’s how we protect survivors, prevent overreach, gather evidence that can withstand judicial scrutiny, and hold perpetrators to account. In a similar context, we’ve opposed abusive domestic cybercrime laws and policing powers that invite censorship, arbitrary surveillance, and other human rights abuses

In this two-part series, we’ll provide background on the ICC and OTP’s draft policy, including what we like about the policy and areas that raise questions.

OTP Defines Cyber-Enabled Crimes

The ICC, established by the Rome Statute, is the permanent international criminal court with jurisdiction over individuals for four core crimes—genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes, and the crime of aggression. It also exercises jurisdiction over offences against the administration of justice at the court itself. Within the court, the OTP is an independent organization responsible for investigating these crimes and prosecuting them.

The OTP’s draft policy explains how it will apply the statute when crimes are committed or facilitated by digital means, while emphasizing that ordinary cybercrimes (e.g., hacking, fraud, data theft) are outside ICC jurisdiction and remain the responsibility of national courts to address.

The OTP defines “cyber-enabled crime” as crimes within the court’s jurisdiction that are committed or facilitated by technology. “Committed by” covers cases where the online act is the harmful act (or an essential digital contribution), for example, malware is used to disable a hospital and people are injured or die, so the cyber operation can be the attack itself.

A crime is “facilitated by” technology, according to the OTP draft, when digital activity helps someone commit a crime under modes of liability other than direct commission (e.g., ordering, inducing, aiding or abetting), and it doesn’t matter if the main crime was itself committed online. For example, authorities use mass digital surveillance to locate members of a protected group, enabling arrests and abuses as part of a widespread or systematic attack (i.e., persecution).

It further makes clear that the OTP will use its full investigative powers under the Rome Statute—relying on national authorities acting under domestic law and, where possible, on voluntary cooperation from private entities—to secure digital evidence across borders.

Such investigations can be highly intrusive and risk sweeping up data about people beyond the target. Yet many states’ current investigative practices fall short of international human rights standards. The draft should therefore make clear that cooperating states must meet those standards, including by assessing whether they can conduct surveillance in a manner consistent with the rule of law and the right to privacy.

Digital Conduct as Evidence of Rome Statute Crimes

Even when no ICC crime happens entirely online, the OTP says online activity can still be relevant evidence. Digital conduct can help show intent, context, or policies behind abuses (for example, to prove a persecution campaign), and it can also reveal efforts to hide or exploit crimes (like propaganda). In simple terms, online activity can corroborate patterns, link incidents, and support inferences about motive, policy, and scale relevant to these crimes.

The prosecution of such crimes or the use of related evidence must be consistent with internationally recognized human rights standards, including privacy and freedom of expression, the very freedoms that allow human rights defenders, journalists, and ordinary users to document and share evidence of abuses.

In Part II we’ll take a closer look at the substance of our comments about the policy’s strengths and our recommendations for improvements and more clarity.

U.S. Air Force Maj. Adam Fuhrmann ’11 was one of 10 individuals chosen from a field of 8,000 applicants for the 2025 U.S. astronaut candidate class, NASA announced in a live ceremony on Sept. 22. 

This is NASA’s 24th class of astronaut candidates since the first Mercury 7 astronauts were chosen in 1959. Upon completion of his training, Fuhrmann will be the 45th MIT graduate to become a flight-eligible astronaut.

“As test pilots we don't do anything on our own, we work with amazing teams of engineers and maintenance professionals to plan, simulate, and execute complex and sometimes risky missions in aircraft to collect data and accomplish a mission, all while assessing risk and making smart calls as a team to do that as safely as possible,” Fuhrmann said at NASA’s announcement ceremony in Houston, Texas. “I'm happy to try to bring some of that experience to do the same thing with the NASA team and learn from everyone at Johnson Space Center how to apply those lessons to human spaceflight.”

His class now begins two years of training at the Johnson Space Center in Houston that includes instruction and skills development for complex operations aboard the International Space Station, Artemis missions to the moon, and beyond. Training includes robotics, land and water survival, geology, foreign language, space medicine and physiology, and more, while also conducting simulated spacewalks and flying high-performance jets.

From MIT to astronaut training

Fuhrmann, 35, is from Leesburg, Virginia, and has accumulated more than 2,100 flight hours in 27 aircraft, including the F-16 and F-35. He has served as a U.S. Air Force fighter pilot and experimental test pilot for nearly 14 years and deployed in support of operations Freedom’s Sentinel and Resolute Support, logging 400 combat hours.

Fuhrmann holds a bachelor’s degree in aeronautics and astronautics from MIT and master’s degrees in flight test engineering and systems engineering from the U.S. Air Force Test Pilot School and Purdue University, respectively. While at MIT, he was a member of Air Force ROTC Detachment 365 and was selected as the third-ever student leader of the Bernard M. Gordon-MIT Engineering Leadership Program (GEL) in spring 2011.

“We are tremendously proud of Adam for this notable accomplishment, and we look forward to following his journey through astronaut candidate school and beyond,” says Leo McGonagle, GEL founding and executive director.

“It’s always a thrill to learn that one of our own has joined NASA's illustrious astronaut corps,” says Julie Shah, head of the MIT Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics and the H.N. Slater Professor in Aeronautics and Astronautics. “Adam is Course 16’s 19th astronaut alum. We take very seriously the responsibility to provide the very best aerospace engineering education, and it's so gratifying to see that those fundamentals continue to set individuals from our community on the path to becoming an astronaut.”

Learning to be a leader at MIT

McGonagle recalls that Fuhrmann was a very early participant in GEL from 2009 to 2011.

“The GEL Program was still in its infancy during this time and was in somewhat of a fragile state as we were seeking to grow and cement ourselves as a viable MIT program. As the fall 2010 semester was winding down, it was evident that the program needed an effective GEL2 student leader during the spring semester, who could lead by example and inspire fellow students and who was an example of what right looks like. I knew Adam was already an emerging leader as a senior cadet in MIT’s Air Force ROTC Detachment, so I tapped him for the role of spring student leader of GEL,” said McGonagle.

Fuhrmann initially sought to decline this role, citing his time as a leader in ROTC. But McGonagle, having led the Army ROTC Program prior to GEL, felt that the GEL Student Leader role would challenge and develop Fuhrmann in other ways. In GEL, he would be charged with leading and inspiring students from a broad background of experiences, and focused exclusively on leading within engineering contexts, while engaging with engineering industry organizations.

“GEL needed strong student leadership at this time, so Adam took on the role, and it ended up being a win-win for both him and the program. He later expressed to me that the experience challenged him in ways that he hadn’t anticipated and complemented his Air Force ROTC leadership development. He was grateful for the opportunity, and the program stabilized and grew under Adam’s leadership. He was the right student at the right time and place,” said McGonagle.

Fuhrmann has remained connected to the GEL program. He asked McGonagle to administer his oath of commissioning into the U.S. Air Force, with his family in attendance, at the historic Bunker Hill Monument in Boston. “One of my proudest GEL memories,” said McGonagle, who is a former U.S. Army Lt. Colonel.

Throughout his time in service which included overseas deployments, Fuhrmann has actively participated in Junior Engineering Leader’s Roundtable leadership labs (ELLs) with GEL students, and he has kept in touch with his GEL2 cohort.

“Adam’s GEL2 cohort meets informally once or twice a year, usually via Zoom, to share and discuss professional challenges, lessons learned, life stories, to keep in touch with each other. This small but excellent group of GEL alum is committed to staying connected and supporting one another, as part of the broader GEL community,” said McGonagle.

At the center of nuclear reactors across the United States, a new type of chromium-coated fuel is being used to make the reactors more efficient and more resistant to accidents. The fuel is one of many innovations sprung from collaboration between researchers at MIT and the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) — a relationship that has altered the trajectory of the country’s nuclear industry.

Amid renewed excitement around nuclear energy in America, MIT’s research community is working to further develop next-generation fuels, accelerate the deployment of small modular reactors (SMRs), and enable the first nuclear reactor in space.

Researchers at MIT and INL have worked closely for decades, and the collaboration takes many forms, including joint research efforts, student and postdoc internships, and a standing agreement that lets INL employees spend extended periods on MIT’s campus researching and teaching classes. MIT is also a founding member of the Battelle Energy Alliance, which has managed the Idaho National Laboratory for the Department of Energy since 2005.

The collaboration gives MIT’s community a chance to work on the biggest problems facing America’s nuclear industry while bolstering INL’s research infrastructure.

“The Idaho National Laboratory is the lead lab for nuclear energy technology in the United States today — that’s why it’s essential that MIT works hand in hand with INL,” says Jacopo Buongiorno, the Battelle Energy Alliance Professor in Nuclear Science and Engineering at MIT. “Countless MIT students and postdocs have interned at INL over the years, and a memorandum of understanding that strengthened the collaboration between MIT and INL in 2019 has been extended twice.”

Ian Waitz, MIT’s vice president for research, adds, “The strong collaborative history between MIT and the Idaho National Laboratory enables us to jointly contribute practical technologies to enable the growth of clean, safe nuclear energy. It’s a clear example of how rigorous collaboration across sectors, and among the nation’s top research facilities, can advance U.S. economic prosperity, health, and well-being.”

Research with impact

Much of MIT’s joint research with INL involves tests and simulations of new nuclear materials, fuels, and instrumentation. One of the largest collaborations was part of a global push for more accident-tolerant fuels in the wake of the nuclear accident that followed the 2011 earthquake and tsunami in Fukushima, Japan.

In a series of studies involving INL and members of the nuclear energy industry, MIT researchers helped identify and evaluate alloy materials that could be deployed in the near term to not only bolster safety but also offer higher densities of fuel.

“These new alloys can withstand much more challenging conditions during abnormal occurrences without reacting chemically with steam, which could result in hydrogen explosions during accidents,” explains Buongiorno, who is also the director of science and technology at MIT’s Nuclear Reactor Laboratory and the director of MIT’s Center for Advanced Nuclear Energy Systems. “The fuels can take much more abuse without breaking apart in the reactor, resulting in a higher safety margin.”

The fuels tested at MIT were eventually adopted by power plants across the U.S., starting with the Byron Clean Energy Center in Ogle County, Illinois.

“We’re also developing new materials, fuels, and instrumentation,” Buongiorno says. “People don’t just come to MIT and say, ‘I have this idea, evaluate it for me.’ We collaborate with industry and national labs to develop the new ideas together, and then we put them to the test,  reproducing the environment in which these materials and fuels would operate in commercial power reactors. That capability is quite unique.”

Another major collaboration was led by Koroush Shirvan, MIT’s Atlantic Richfield Career Development Professor in Energy Studies. Shirvan’s team analyzed the costs associated with different reactor designs, eventually developing an open-source tool to help industry leaders evaluate the feasibility of different approaches.

“The reason we’re not building a single nuclear reactor in the U.S. right now is cost and financial risk,” Shirvan says. “The projects have gone over budget by a factor of two and their schedule has lengthened by a factor of 1.5, so we’ve been doing a lot of work assessing the risk drivers. There’s also a lot of different types of reactors proposed, so we’ve looked at their cost potential as well and how those costs change if you can mass manufacture them.”

Other INL-supported research of Shirvan’s involves exploring new manufacturing methods for nuclear fuels and testing materials for use in a nuclear reactor on the surface of the moon.

“You want materials that are lightweight for these nuclear reactors because you have to send them to space, but there isn’t much data around how those light materials perform in nuclear environments,” Shirvan says.

People and progress

Every summer, MIT students at every level travel to Idaho to conduct research in INL labs as interns.

“It’s an example of our students getting access to cutting-edge research facilities,” Shirvan says.

There are also several joint research appointments between the institutions. One such appointment is held by Sacit Cetiner, a distinguished scientist at INL who also currently runs the MIT and INL Joint Center for Reactor Instrumentation and Sensor Physics (CRISP) at MIT’s Nuclear Reactor Laboratory.

CRISP focuses its research on key technology areas in the field of instrumentation and controls, which have long stymied the bottom line of nuclear power generation.

“For the current light-water reactor fleet, operations and maintenance expenditures constitute a sizeable fraction of unit electricity generation cost,” says Cetiner. “In order to make advanced reactors economically competitive, it’s much more reasonable to address anticipated operational issues during the design phase. One such critical technology area is remote and autonomous operations. Working directly with INL, which manages the projects for the design and testing of several advanced reactors under a number of federal programs, gives our students, faculty, and researchers opportunities to make a real impact.”

The sharing of experts helps strengthen MIT and the nation’s nuclear workforce overall.

“MIT has a crucial role to play in advancing the country’s nuclear industry, whether that’s testing and developing new technologies or assessing the economic feasibility of new nuclear designs,” Buongiorno says.

Apple has introduced a new hardware/software security feature in the iPhone 17: “Memory Integrity Enforcement,” targeting the memory safety vulnerabilities that spyware products like Pegasus tend to use to get unauthorized system access. From Wired:

In recent years, a movement has been steadily growing across the global tech industry to address a ubiquitous and insidious type of bugs known as memory-safety vulnerabilities. A computer’s memory is a shared resource among all programs, and memory safety issues crop up when software can pull data that should be off limits from a computer’s memory or manipulate data in memory that shouldn’t be accessible to the program. When developers—­even experienced and security-conscious developers—­write software in ubiquitous, historic programming languages, like C and C++, it’s easy to make mistakes that lead to memory safety vulnerabilities. That’s why proactive tools like ...

Revolution Wind will continue construction after a judge lifted a stop-work order he called "the height of arbitrary and capricious action."

The United Nations is pressuring 100 nations to strengthen their carbon goals in New York. Some governments won't be participating.

A Harvard climate institute and a Washington think tank are leading a new institute to study climate change and risk to financial markets.

House lawmakers urged the Trump administration to be more aggressive about developing respirators.

AirCo’s sustainable aviation fuel could be commercialized next year, its CEO says.

The request from municipal officials comes as congressional Republicans draft a follow-up to the bipartisan infrastructure law of 2021.

The governor said the state will instead continue to invest in infrastructure improvements.

China stands ready to fill the gap as EU infighting leaves a vacuum in global climate talks.

Water experts said the city's explosive growth and mismanagement of sewage have damaged a centuries-old network of cascading lakes.

The market is new, but some researchers and entrepreneurs think electric tractors will be ideal for farmers who care about sustainability.

MIT has placed second in U.S. News and World Report’s annual rankings of the nation’s best universities, announced today. 

As in past years, MIT’s engineering program continues to lead the list of undergraduate engineering programs at a doctoral institution. The Institute also placed first in five out of 10 engineering disciplines.

U.S. News placed MIT first in its evaluation of undergraduate computer science programs, ranking it No. 1 in four out of 10 computer science disciplines.

MIT also topped the list of undergraduate business programs, a ranking it shares with the University of Pennsylvania. Among business subfields, MIT is ranked first in two out of 10 specialties.

Within the magazine’s rankings of “academic programs to look for,” MIT topped the list in the category of undergraduate research and creative projects. The Institute also ranks as the second most innovative national university and the fourth best value, according to the U.S. News peer assessment survey of top academics.

MIT placed first in five engineering specialties: aerospace/aeronautical/astronautical engineering; chemical engineering; computer engineering; materials engineering; and mechanical engineering. It placed within the top five in two other engineering areas: biomedical engineering and electrical/electronic/communication engineering.

Other schools in the top five overall for undergraduate engineering programs are Stanford University, the University of California at Berkeley, Georgia Tech, Caltech, the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, and the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor.

In computer science, MIT placed first in four specialties: artificial intelligence (shared with Carnegie Mellon University); biocomputing/bioinformatics/biotechnology; computer systems; and theory. It placed in the top five of six other disciplines: cybersecurity; data analytics/science; game/simulation development (shared with Carnegie Mellon); mobile/web applications; programming languages; and software engineering.

Other schools in the top five overall for undergraduate computer science programs are Carnegie Mellon, Stanford, UC Berkeley, Princeton University, and Georgia Tech.

Among undergraduate business specialties, the MIT Sloan School of Management leads in production/operations management and quantitative analysis. It also placed within the top five in five other categories: analytics; entrepreneurship; finance; management information systems; and supply chain management/logistics.

Other undergraduate business programs ranking in the top five include UC Berkeley, the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor, and New York University.

Recently, U.S. News & World Report ranked medium to large undergraduate economics programs based on a peer assessment survey; MIT’s economics program has placed first in this ranking.

Nature Climate Change, Published online: 23 September 2025; doi:10.1038/s41558-025-02429-4

Causal approaches employed at the scale of commercial agriculture are required to build high-quality evidence that climate-smart agricultural interventions result in real emissions reductions and removals. Such project-scale empirical data are additionally required to demonstrate and advance the viability of process-based models and digital measurement, reporting and verification as tools to scale soil carbon accounting.

Nature Climate Change, Published online: 23 September 2025; doi:10.1038/s41558-025-02443-6

Wildland fires are becoming more frequent in high-latitude regions. Here the authors show that these fires delay the formation of snow cover in the Arctic, which will be exacerbated under future warming due to increases in burned areas.

One of the reasons we opposed the TikTok "ban" is that the First Amendment is supposed to protect us from government using its power to manipulate speech. But as predicted, the TikTok "ban" has only resulted in turning over the platform to the allies of a president who seems to have no respect for the First Amendment.

TikTok was never proven to be a current national security problem, so it's hard to say the sale will alleviate those unproven concerns. And it remains to be seen if the deal places any limits on the new ownership sharing user data with foreign governments or anyone else—the security concern that purportedly justified the forced sale. As for the algorithm, if the concern had been that TikTok could be a conduit for Chinese government propaganda—a concern the Supreme Court declined to even consider—people can now be concerned that TikTok could be a conduit for U.S. government propaganda. An administration official reportedly has said the new TikTok algorithm will be "retrained" with U.S. data to make sure the system is "behaving properly."

This is the fourth installment in a blog series documenting EFF's findings from the Stop Censoring Abortion campaign. You can read additional posts here. 

One of the goals of our Stop Censoring Abortion campaign was to put names, stories, and numbers to the experiences we’d been hearing about: people and organizations having their abortion-related content – or entire accounts – removed or suppressed on social media. In reviewing survey submissions, we found that multiple users reported experiencing shadowbanning. Shadowbanning (or “deranking”) is widely experienced and reported by content creators across various social media platforms, and it’s a phenomenon that those who create content about abortion and sexual and reproductive health know all too well.

Shadowbanning is the often silent suppression of certain types of content or creators in your social media feeds. It’s not something that a U.S-based creator is notified about, but rather something they simply find out when their posts stop getting the same level of engagement that they’re used to, or when people are unable to easily find their account using the platform’s search function. Essentially, it is when a platform or its algorithm decides that other users should see less of a creator or specific topic. Many platforms deny that shadowbanning exists; they will often blame reduced reach of posts on ‘bugs’ in the algorithm. At the same time, companies like Meta have admitted that content is ranked, but much about how this ranking system works remains unknown.  Meta says that there are five content categories that while allowed on its platforms, “may not be eligible for recommendation.” Content discussing abortion pills may fall under the umbrella of “Content that promotes the use of certain regulated products,” but posts that simply affirm abortion as a valid reproductive decision or are of storytellers sharing their experiences don’t match any of the criteria that would make it unable to be recommended by Meta.

Whether a creator relies on a platform for income or uses it to educate the public, shadowbanning can be devastating for the growth of an account. And this practice often seems to disproportionately affect people who are talking about ‘taboo’ topics like sex, abortion, and LGBTQ+ identities, such as Kim Adamski, a sexual health educator who shared her story with our Stop Censoring Abortion project. As you can see in the images below, Kim’s Instagram account does not show up as a suggestion when being searched, and can only be found after typing in the full username.

Earlier this year, the Center for Intimacy Justice shared their report, "The Digital Gag: Suppression of Sexual and Reproductive Health on Meta, TikTok, Amazon, and Google", which found that of the 159 nonprofits, content creators, sex educators, and businesses surveyed, 63% had content removed on Meta platforms and 55% had content removed on TikTok. This suppression is happening at the same time as platforms continue to allow and elevate videos of violence and gore and extremist hateful content. This pattern is troubling and is only becoming more prevalent as people turn to social media to find the information they need to make decisions about their health.

Reproductive rights and sex education have been under attack across the U.S. for decades. Since the Dobbs v. Jackson decision in 2022, 20 states have banned or limited access to abortion. Meanwhile, 16 states don’t require sex education in public schools to be medically accurate, 19 states have laws that stigmatize LGBTQ+ identities in their sex education curricula, and 17 states specifically stigmatize abortion in their sex education curricula.

In a world that is constantly finding ways to legislate away bodily autonomy and hide queer identities, social media platforms have an opportunity to stand as safe havens for access to community and knowledge.

Online platforms are critical lifelines for people seeking possibly life-saving information about their sexual and reproductive health. We know that when people are unable to find or access the information they need within their communities, they will turn to the internet and social media. This is especially important for abortion-seekers and trans youth living in states where healthcare is being criminalized.

In a world that is constantly finding ways to legislate away bodily autonomy and hide queer identities, social media platforms have an opportunity to stand as safe havens for access to community and knowledge. Limiting access to this information by suppressing the people and organizations who are providing it is an attack on free expression and a profound threat to freedom of information—principles that these platforms claim to uphold. Now more than ever, we must continue to push back against censorship of sexual and reproductive health information so that the internet can still be a place where all voices are heard and where all can learn.

This is the fourth post in our blog series documenting the findings from our Stop Censoring Abortion campaign. Read more in the series: https://www.eff.org/pages/stop-censoring-abortion